Amazon Requests Stay in Social Casino Lawsuit

amazon social casino lawsuit
Amazon is seeking immunity after being named in a lawsuit for promoting social casinos, requesting a stay under the Communication Decent Act until  a decision has been made on other similar legal matters involved other technology brands.

Amazon, the multinational technology company, is currently grappling with a lawsuit accusing it of profiting from illegal online casino applications. The tech giant has sought legal protection under the Communication Decency Act (CDA), asking the court to halt the case until a similar lawsuit against other tech companies is resolved.

What Did Amazon Do Wrong?

The lawsuit, filed by Nevada resident Steven Horn, accuses Amazon of supporting over 30 virtual casinos, thereby putting its customers at risk. Horn alleges that he became addicted to these online casino apps, leading him to file a case against the company. The suit seeks restitution, damages, and other relief from Amazon for its alleged involvement in an unlawful internet gambling enterprise.

Play Now at BetOnline

However, Amazon is not accepting these allegations. The company has invoked the CDA, a federal law that provides immunity to online platforms from claims related to third-party content on their websites. Amazon has requested that the court delay the case until similar lawsuits against Apple, Google, and Meta are resolved.

As part of the lawsuit, Amazon’s involvement in distributing illegal casino games is called into question. These games, while free to play, offer virtual chips that can be won by players. However, players need to purchase more chips to continue playing, leading to potentially addictive behavior.

Horn’s complaint asserts that Amazon knowingly allowed these illegal casino apps on its platform and benefited financially from them. He alleges that Amazon acted as a bank for these illegal social casino apps and misled players by promoting free-to-play games.

“Despite knowing that social casinos are illegal, Amazon continues to maintain a 30% financial interest in the upside by brokering the slot machine games, driving customers to them, and acting as the bank” – Horn’s complaint says.

How to CDA Protects Tech Companies

The CDA, passed in 1996, was designed to protect internet platforms from legal claims over third-party content. This law has been a critical shield for tech companies against numerous lawsuits over the years.

As per Amazon’s legal team, the ongoing lawsuit should either be dismissed under the CDA’s Section 230 immunity provision or paused until similar cases against other tech giants are resolved.

While Amazon denies any wrongdoing, it has requested a stay in the lawsuit, arguing that a pause in litigation will simplify matters for all involved.

“A stay will benefit everyone–including Mr. Horn–by avoiding “unnecessary briefing and premature expenditures of time, attorney’s fees, and resources” until the Court and the parties know the scope of Section 230 immunity in this context.” .– reads a statement from Amazon’s legal team

The other cases that Amazon wants to wait on involve Google, Apple, and Meta. The decision from these appeals could either dismiss or significantly simplify the CDA immunity issue in Amazon’s case.

Despite the ongoing legal battle, Amazon continues to maintain its stance, asserting that it operates within the confines of the law. The company has yet to respond officially to the lawsuit, making the future of this case uncertain.

All Eyes on Tech Lawsuits

The upcoming months will be crucial for Amazon as it fights this lawsuit. The outcome could not only affect the company’s operations but also set a precedent for how the CDA is interpreted in the future, potentially impacting many other tech companies. As the legal proceedings unfold, we’ll be keeping our eyes on how these lawsuits against Google, Apple, and Meta play out.

Leave a Comment